“Yes, it’s real”: Treasury confirms draft design for $1 Trump coin

A draft design for a commemorative $1 coin featuring President Donald Trump has ignited political and legal debate over the boundaries of presidential iconography and the federal laws governing U.S. currency.

The U.S. Treasury confirmed Friday that the sketches, showing Trump’s profile on one side and his raised fist above an American flag on the other, were part of a series of concept designs for the nation’s upcoming semiquincentennial celebration in 2026. The proposed coin includes the phrases “Liberty,” “In God We Trust,” and “1776–2026.”

No fake news here. These first drafts honoring America’s 250th Birthday and @POTUS are real.

Looking forward to sharing more soon, once the obstructionist shutdown of the United States government is over. https://t.co/c6HChM6ijG

— U.S. Treasurer Brandon Beach (@TreasurerBeach) October 3, 2025

Treasurer Brandon Beach called the designs “preliminary and subject to review,” but said they reflect “America’s story and its modern leaders.” Critics argue that the inclusion of a living political figure violates long-standing norms and likely federal statute. Under 31 U.S. Code § 5112, living individuals are prohibited from appearing on U.S. coins or currency, including commemoratives tied to national milestones.

The proposal drew swift condemnation from legal experts and lawmakers, who accused the administration of politicizing the nation’s 250th anniversary. Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, expressed strong opposition to the proposed Trump coin. He introduced the “TRUMP Act,” aiming to prevent the issuance of the coin, and criticized it as a “political stunt” and a “campaign souvenir.”

According to Politico, a Treasury Department spokesperson emphasized that the coin design reflects “American resilience and progress under Trump’s leadership,” even amidst challenges such as a current government shutdown.

The Treasury has not indicated whether the coin will be minted or circulated, and any final decision would likely face court challenges. Still, the controversy underscores how even commemorations meant to unite Americans have become flashpoints in an era when political branding increasingly merges with national identity.